Essay Topics
Types of Essays
Essay Checklist
Word Counter
Readability Score
Essay Rewriter
The prisoners are quite often handcuffed while being brought from prison to court and vice versa for the sake of security and discipline. Even suspects and under trials are subjected to this humiliating treatment. However, the Supreme Court, in Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration observed that, "handcuffing is, prima facie, inhuman and therefore, unreasonable and harsh and at the first flush arbitrary....to inflict 'irons' is to resort to zoological strategies repugnant to Article 21". The Court pointed out that where in extreme cases the accused is to be handcuffed; the escorting authority must inform the court and record reasons for doing so. It is only after getting judicial approval that handcuffing should be resorted to. Earlier, in 1978, the Supreme Court in Sunil Batra and Sobraj's case, was seized with the question of legality of prison bars and fetters on undertrials and held that handcuffing was violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 and be used only in exceptional cases, that too with the prior judicial sanction. The two petitioners in this case were Sunil Batra, an Indian under death sentence and Charles Sobraj a French national, an undertrial facing detention under MISA from July 1976 and accused of jail-break and other serious charges. The Court held that locomotion is one of the facets of personal liberty and therefore, should not be curtailed as far as possible. However, where absolutely necessary, handcuffing should be only for small spells and grounds for 'fetters' shall be given to the prisoner and recorded with due approval of the judicial authority.
Essay Writing Checklist
The following guidelines are designed to give students a checklist to use, whether they are revising individually or as part of a peer review team.
Introduction
  • Is the main idea (i.e., the writer's opinion of the story title) stated clearly?
  • Is the introductory paragraph interesting? Does it make the reader want to keep on reading?
Body Paragraph
  • Does each body paragraph have a clear topic sentence that is related to the main idea of the essay?
  • Does each body paragraph include specific information from the text(including quoted evidence from the text, if required by the instructor)that supports the topic sentence?
  • Is there a clear plan for the order of the body paragraphs (i.e., order of importance, chronology in the story, etc.)?
  • Does each body paragraph transition smoothly to the next?
Conclusion
  • Is the main idea of the essay restated in different words?
  • Are the supporting ideas summarized succinctly and clearly?
  • Is the concluding paragraph interesting? Does it leave an impression on the reader?
Overall Essay
  • Is any important material left unsaid?
  • Is any material repetitious and unnecessary?
  • Has the writer tried to incorporate "voice" in the essay so that it has his/her distinctive mark?
  • Are there changes needed in word choice, sentence length and structure, etc.?
  • Are the quotations (if required) properly cited?
  • Has the essay been proofread for spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc.?
  • Does the essay have an interesting and appropriate title?
The Bar against Hand-Cuffing in India
Trending Essay Topics
Reference
Feel free to use content on this page for your website, blog or paper we only ask that you reference content back to us. Use the following code to link this page:
Terms · Privacy · Contact
Essay Topics © 2018

The Bar Against Hand-Cuffing In India

Words: 256    Pages: 1    Paragraphs: 4    Sentences: 15    Read Time: 00:55
Highlight Text to add correction. Use an editor to spell check essay.
              The prisoners are quite often handcuffed while being brought from prison to court and vice versa for the sake of security and discipline. Even suspects and under trials are subjected to this humiliating treatment.
             
              However, the Supreme Court, in Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration observed that, "handcuffing is, prima facie, inhuman and therefore, unreasonable and harsh and at the first flush arbitrary. . . . to inflict 'irons' is to resort to zoological strategies repugnant to Article 21". The Court pointed out that where in extreme cases the accused is to be handcuffed; the escorting authority must inform the court and record reasons for doing so. It is only after getting judicial approval that handcuffing should be resorted to.
             
              Earlier, in 1978, the Supreme Court in Sunil Batra and Sobraj's case, was seized with the question of legality of prison bars and fetters on undertrials and held that handcuffing was violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 and be used only in exceptional cases, that too with the prior judicial sanction. The two petitioners in this case were Sunil Batra, an Indian under death sentence and Charles Sobraj a French national, an undertrial facing detention under MISA from July 1976 and accused of jail-break and other serious charges.
             
              The Court held that locomotion is one of the facets of personal liberty and therefore, should not be curtailed as far as possible. However, where absolutely necessary, handcuffing should be only for small spells and grounds for 'fetters' shall be given to the prisoner and recorded with due approval of the judicial authority.
Crime Essay 
Tip: Use our Essay Rewriter to rewrite this essay and remove plagiarism.

Add Notes

Have suggestions, comments or ideas? Please share below. Don't forget to tag a friend or classmate.
clear
Formatting Help
Submit